Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 91
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 13  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 51-57

Self-reported adherence rates in glaucoma patients in Southwest Nigeria


1 Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, University of Lagos/Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Idi-Araba, Nigeria
2 Department of Ophthalmology, Lions' Eye Centre, General Hospital, Isolo, Lagos, Nigeria

Date of Web Publication4-Apr-2016

Correspondence Address:
Chigozie Anuli Mbadugha
Department of Ophthalmology, Lions' Eye Centre, General Hospital, Isolo, Lagos
Nigeria
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2408-7408.179649

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Context: Nigerian glaucoma patients have an aversion to surgery and often rely on medical therapy to prevent disease progression. For medical therapy to be effective, the drugs have to be used as prescribed. Compliance has been reported to be low in the previous Nigerian studies. Aims: To evaluate the adherence rates of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) patients on medical therapy using patient self-report. Settings and Design: A hospital-based cross-sectional design was used to assess consecutive POAG patients attending a glaucoma clinic in a Tertiary Hospital in Lagos, Nigeria. Subjects and Methods: Self-reported adherence was evaluated by trained interviewers. Comprehensive clinical assessment including intraocular pressure, gonioscopy, visual field assessment, and dilated binocular funduscopy using the slit lamp and + 78D fundus lens was done. Statistical Analysis Used: Data analysis was done using MedCalc Statistical Software. Results: One hundred and fourteen patients reported adherence rates ranging from 10% to 100% with a mean adherence rate of 82.33% ± 19.25%. Only 31 respondents (27.2%) reported 100% adherence. Duration of the disease was the only significant factor on multiple regression analysis. Conclusions: The development of strategies to improve compliance and persistence in glaucoma patients is crucial for the reduction of disease progression and blindness.

Keywords: Adherence rates, glaucoma, self-report


How to cite this article:
Onakoya AO, Mbadugha CA. Self-reported adherence rates in glaucoma patients in Southwest Nigeria. J Clin Sci 2016;13:51-7

How to cite this URL:
Onakoya AO, Mbadugha CA. Self-reported adherence rates in glaucoma patients in Southwest Nigeria. J Clin Sci [serial online] 2016 [cited 2019 Sep 22];13:51-7. Available from: http://www.jcsjournal.org/text.asp?2016/13/2/51/179649


  Introduction Top


Glaucoma is the second leading cause of blindness in Nigeria [1] and the leading cause of irreversible blindness globally. [2] Reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) using medications is the mainstay of glaucoma management in Nigeria as patients are often unwilling to accept the option of filtration surgery. [3] The consistent use of glaucoma medications as prescribed by physicians is crucial for the achievement of target IOPs and prevention of disease progression and visual loss in patients. [4] Adherence is defined as the degree to which a patient follows the instructions to take a prescribed treatment during a defined period of time [5] while persistence describes the time from initiation of therapy to its discontinuance by the patient. Adherence and persistence have largely replaced the term compliance although adherence and compliance are sometimes used interchangeably. Low rates of adherence or compliance to glaucoma medications have been reported in Nigeria [6],[7] and other countries. [8],[9]

White coat adherence refers to more frequent and accurate use of eye drops close to clinic appointments and may explain disease progression despite apparent achievement of target IOPs. Some Nigerian glaucoma patients, on the contrary, exhibit "a reverse white coat adherence syndrome." They have a tendency not to use their eye drops prior to attending clinic visits as they "do not want the drugs to interfere with the results of tests done during the visit." The morning dose of eye drops due for application on the appointment day is often omitted. Nigerian glaucoma patients who exhaust their medication within a fortnight of their scheduled clinic appointment often do not refill their prescriptions because they are unsure if the doctor would recommend a different medication at that visit. This has also been reported by a Jamaican study. [10]

Adherence and persistence may be assessed using electronic monitors, [11] pharmacy refills and administrative claims data, [12] and self-reports. [13] We assessed the self-reported adherence rate of patients attending a glaucoma clinic in Southwest Nigeria with a view to elucidating factors that affect adherence and suggesting interventions to improve adherence.


  Subjects and methods Top


A hospital-based, cross-sectional study design was used to evaluate self-reported adherence rates in patients attending a glaucoma clinic. Consecutive patients aged 40 years and above on topical medications for primary open angle glaucoma were recruited as participants. Patients with secondary glaucoma or other eye pathologies which could account for visual field defects simulating glaucoma were excluded from the study. The tenets of the declaration of Helsinki (October 2008 revision) were adhered to. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants, and ethical permission was given by the Institution's Research and Ethical Committee.

All patients were interviewed using a short questionnaire designed for the study in which biodata and relevant clinical information were noted. They all underwent a comprehensive ocular examination which included visual acuity assessment, Goldmann applanation tonometry; gonioscopy using a 2-mirror gonioscopy lens (Ocular instruments, Bellevue WA, USA); slit lamp examination (Haag-Streit Slit lamp); dilated stereoscopic optic nerve head assessment using a +78D contact lens (Volk instruments, USA); and standard automated perimetry (Optifield Sinemed Inc., Benicia, CA, USA). Reliable visual field tests were defined as: false-positive and false-negative errors <30% and fixation losses <20%. A modified Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson classification [14] was used to stage the disease. A mean deviation of ≤−6 decibels (dB) was defined as mild visual field loss, >−6 dB but <−12 dB as moderate visual field loss and >−12 dB as severe visual field loss. Cases were classified based on the more severely affected eye.

Self-reported adherence was evaluated by trained interviewers who were also the 2 nd year ophthalmology residents. They maintained an empathic stance and admitted to the participants that chronic use of medications on a daily basis could be bothersome and difficult to abide by. The adherence interview took place at the beginning of the clinic visit before the patients' consultation with the ophthalmologist carrying out the comprehensive clinical assessment. The participants were then asked to display their medications if available and give details of how they had been instructed to instill them and how they had been using their drugs. The interviewers were trained on the correct regimen for each medication. After ascertaining the correct prescribed regimen, the patients were asked to assess as a percentage, how exact their use of their medication in the past 30 days was in comparison to the correct prescribed regimen, taking the recommended frequency and timing into consideration. Patients who had adherence rates <100% were asked to give reasons for their failure to adhere to the prescribed regimen if any. Adherence rates were defined as good or adequate if they ranged from 95% to 100% and as poor or inadequate if they were <95%. [15]

The data obtained were analyzed using MedCalc Statistical Software Version 12.7.5 (MedCalc Software Buba, Ostend, Belgium). The influence of sociodemographic variables such as age, sex, religion, occupation, educational, and marital status on adherence rates was assessed using odds ratio (OR), Chi-square, and Fisher exact tests as appropriate. Multiple regression analysis was done to examine the influence of confounding variables. All tests were two-tailed, and a P < 0.05 was defined as statistically significant.


  Results Top


The study population comprised 44 males (38.6%) and 70 females (61.4%) with a mean age of 58.58 ± 10.5 years. Twelve of them (10.5%) had a prior history of glaucoma surgery but were on topical ocular hypotensives at the time of the study. Self-reported adherence rates ranged from 10% to 100% with a mean adherence rate of 82.33% ± 19.25%. [Table 1] shows the mean adherence rates across varied patient characteristics. Only 31 respondents (27.2%) reported 100% adherence. Fourteen of them (45.2%) were male, whereas the rest (54.8%) were female. Fifty-nine respondents (51.75%) had adherence rates ranging from 80% to 95% while 24 (21.1%) reported adherence rates <80%. Half of the respondents with adherence rates <80% (n = 12) reported adherence rates ≤50%.
Table 1: Adherence rates across patient characteristics

Click here to view


[Table 2] compares the patient characteristics of patients who had 100% adherence rates to those who did not. Patients who had been managed for glaucoma for <6 years were 12 times more likely to report 100% adherence than patients who had been managed for glaucoma for 6 years or more (OR: 12.93; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.67-100). There was no statistically significant difference in the adherence rates of patients with a positive family history of glaucoma compared to those without a family history (P = 0.81) or those who were aware of the disease for which they were being managed compared to those who were unaware (P = 0.22).
Table 2: A comparison of patient characteristics of totally adherent patients to other patients

Click here to view


Majority of the respondents (n = 74, 64.9%) were on monotherapy. Thirty-four (29.8%) were on two topical medications while 6 (5.3%) were on three topical medications. Patients on monotherapy were not more likely to report 100% adherence than those on two or three medications (OR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.34-1.89). [Table 3] shows the frequency and the mean self-reported adherence rates for the various drug classes and combinations the respondents were on.
Table 3: Adherence rates across drug groups and combinationss

Click here to view


[Table 4] shows the results of multiple regression analysis. Duration of disease was the only factor that remained statistically significant after regression analysis. The reasons given for failure to adhere to the treatment regimen are listed in [Table 5] in order of frequency.
Table 4: Results of multiple regression analysis

Click here to view
Table 5: Barriers to adherence

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Adherence to glaucoma medications reduces the likelihood of progressive visual loss and blindness. [16] Poor adherence may result in repeated modification of drug regimens and performance of filtration surgeries. Poorly adherent patients are unlikely to use postoperative drugs adequately resulting in poor outcome, progression of disease, and visual loss. Poor compliance has been identified as a risk factor for glaucoma-related blindness. [17],[18] Glaucoma patients benefit maximally from medical treatment if they adhere strictly to prescribed drug regimens, and physicians can only accurately assess the effectiveness of medical therapy in adherent patients.

More than two-thirds (72.8%) of the participants, in this study, reported <100% adherence. This is much higher than the 5-45% of participants not totally adherent in studies done in other countries. [11],[19],[20],[21],[22] It is even higher than the 60-66.1% noncompliance rates previously reported by earlier studies in Nigeria. [6],[7],[23] Patient, prescriber, or dispenser based reasons for noncompliance of Nigerian glaucoma patients have been reported previously. [24]

Knowledge

Surprisingly, an awareness of their diagnosis did not correspond to statistically significant higher adherence rates and suggested that other factors that influence adherence, such as cost of treatment, may play major roles in determining patient adherence. Several studies have reported that adequate patient knowledge and understanding of the disease is associated with better adherence to medical treatment. [6],[10],[18],[25],[26],[27],[28],[29] Although patients with a positive family history of glaucoma were more likely to report total adherence than those without, this finding was not statistically significant [Table 2]. Omoti and Waziri-Erameh [7] reported that a family history of glaucoma was not associated with better compliance.

Duration of disease

Patients who had been managed for glaucoma for 6 years and more had the lowest adherence rates [Table 1] and were 12 times less likely to report 100% adherence though the extremely wide CI (1.67-100) suggests that a study with a larger sample size will give a more precise estimate of this effect. Over time, patients' fear of blindness and faith in drop efficacy, which have been identified as motivating factors for adherence [30],[31] may reduce and result in less adherence. This is contrary to the finding in other studies [10],[27],[32] that patients with a longer duration of disease adhered better to medications. Duration of disease was the only factor affecting adherence that remained statistically significant after multiple logistic regression analysis [Table 4]. Periodic eye health messages to improve adherence should therefore be designed to include even patients who have been managed for glaucoma for a long time.

Drug regimen

The complexity of the drug regimen as evidenced by the number of eye drops did not influence self-reported adherence rates in this study [Table 1] and [Table 2]. Patients on monotherapy did not report higher adherence rates [Table 4]. Intensive patient counseling about higher baseline IOPs or failure to achieve target IOPs necessitating the use of two classes of antiglaucoma medications may have resulted in greater patient motivation for adherence to treatment in this group of patients. Some other studies [7],[11],[30],[33] also did not find higher adherence rates in patients with simpler drug regimen. On the contrary, other studies have reported better compliance rates in patients on single daily drug doses or combination treatment. [22],[25],[34]

Severity of disease

Adherence rates increased with increasing severity of the disease [Table 1], although this trend was not statistically significant (P = 0.62). Patients with a history of previous glaucoma surgery in this study also reported better adherence rates than those who had been on medical therapy only [Table 1]. This difference between patients who had undergone surgery for glaucoma and those who had not was also reported in the study by Castro et al. [20]

Barriers to adherence

The most common reasons proffered by patients for nonadherence [Table 5] were the inconvenience of using eye drops which disrupt daily routines, forgetfulness, and cost and lack of availability of drugs. Tsai et al [31] systematically classified factors affecting compliance into patient, provider, environmental and regimen factors. In this study, environmental factors (competing interests), regimen factors (cost, availability, side effects) and patient factors (cost, knowledge, forgetfulness, motivation/health beliefs) were largely implicated.

Inconvenience and forgetfulness which were the leading reasons for nonadherence in this study were less common in a previous study in Southwest Nigeria. [6] This may be due to the fact that the cosmopolitan city of Lagos in which the present study was conducted is characteristically busier and more hectic than in Benin City, the study town of the earlier study. Cost and unavailability were major reasons for default in the two studies. This is not surprising as some antiglaucoma drugs are expensive and most Nigerian patients make out of the pocket payments for their drugs. Most of these medications are imported into the country, and any logistic difficulty in this process results in a sudden scarcity of the drugs with severe consequences on the patients. There is therefore need to explore the possibility of local manufacture of antiglaucoma drugs and encourage better subscription to the evolving National Health Insurance Scheme to reduce these barriers. Side effects were not a leading cause of nonadherence, unlike in the earlier study. [6] This may have been due to the fact that the drug regimen used by participants in the two studies varied. Some of these reasons given for nonadherence have been reported previously: Forgetfulness, [6],[10],[18],[25],[30],[35],[36] cost, [6],[10],[25],[35] unavailability, [6],[10] and side effects. [6],[19],[35]

Sociodemographic characteristics

The relationship between adherence and sociodemographic factors such as age, gender, race, ethnicity and education is complex [30] but can assist in identifying patient characteristics that suggest a higher likelihood of nonadherence. In this study, age, gender, ethnicity, religion, occupation, marital, and educational status did not significantly influence adherence [Table 2]. This is similar to the findings in earlier studies in Nigeria. [6],[7] Similarly, Mowatt et al. [10] in Jamaica reported that age, gender, and education had no effect on adherence. Kosoko et al. [16] reported that males were less adherent than females while Lunnela et al. [37] found no gender difference in their study. Both studies, [16],[37] however, report that older patients were more adherent than younger patients.

There was an unusually low male to female ratio (0.63:1) in this study compared to other hospital-based studies previously reported in Nigeria. Some studies done in Nigeria [3],[38] reported male preponderance with a male:female ratio of about 1.3:1. Onyekwe et al. [39] in Onitsha, Southeast Nigeria, however, reported a slight female preponderance in their study with a male:female ratio of 1:1.1. The reason for the female preponderance in this study is unclear. It could suggest that females in the study location were more enlightened and had better health seeking behaviors, or perhaps found it easier to take time off work for hospital visits than their male counterparts, or it may have been an incidental finding as participants were recruited consecutively into the study.

Recommendations

We recommend periodic patient education by trained office staff or counselors using patient-centered communication techniques. Tailoring drug regimens to daily routines may enhance memory, reduce forgetfulness, and make drug instillation appear less disruptive to busy daily schedules. Written instructions or medication reminders in diaries or phones and involvement of a committed caregiver or assistant may also improve adherence. There is also a need for advocacy to reduce the cost of antiglaucoma drugs and improve year-round availability.

Strengths and limitations of this study

The results of this study though not generalizable to the community, provide valuable insight into the factors influencing adherence in this population. Adherence was measured using self-report method which was the most feasible method in our environment. Self-report has been associated with overestimation, recall, and pleasing bias. [40] Recall bias may have been reduced by limiting the period of assessment of adherence to the preceding 4 weeks, but this could not be totally eliminated. Pleasing bias was reduced by using trained interviewers who were empathic and nonjudgmental in their enquiry. With 72.8% of participants admitting <100% adherence, it is unlikely that overestimation occurred significantly in this study.


  Conclusions Top


The high proportion of patients reporting less than total adherence to glaucoma medications in this study is worrisome. It highlights the need for focused and aggressive interventional strategies to improve adherence to medical treatment among Nigerian glaucoma patients. This is crucial for the reduction of glaucoma-related blindness in Nigeria.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Rabiu MM, Kyari F, Ezelum C, Elhassan E, Sanda S, Murthy GV, et al. Review of the publications of the Nigeria national blindness survey: Methodology, prevalence, causes of blindness and visual impairment and outcome of cataract surgery. Ann Afr Med 2012;11:125-30.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.
Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:262-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Adekoya BJ, Akinsola FB, Balogun BG, Balogun MM, Ibidapo OO. Patient refusal of glaucoma surgery and associated factors in Lagos, Nigeria. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2013;20:168-73.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
4.
Kulkarni SV, Damji KF, Buys YM. Medical management of primary open-angle glaucoma: Best practices associated with enhanced patient compliance and persistency. Patient Prefer Adherence 2008;2:303-14.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Friedman DS. Introduction: New insights on enhancing adherence to topical glaucoma medications. Ophthalmology 2009;116 11 Suppl: S29.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Omoti AE, Ukponwan CU. Compliance with new drugs in glaucoma therapy in Benin city Nigeria. Seiguimiento Farmacoterapeutico 2005;3:135-43.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Omoti AE, Waziri-Erameh MJ. Compliance with medical therapy in patients with primary open angle glaucoma. J Med Biomed Res 2003;2:46-53.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Olthoff CM, Schouten JS, van de Borne BW, Webers CA. Noncompliance with ocular hypotensive treatment in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension an evidence-based review. Ophthalmology 2005;112:953-61.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Nordstrom BL, Friedman DS, Mozaffari E, Quigley HA, Walker AM. Persistence and adherence with topical glaucoma therapy. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;140:598-606.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Mowatt L, Nelson-Imoru J, Gordon-Strachan G. Glaucoma medication compliance issues in a Jamaican hospital eye clinic. West Indian Med J 2011;60:541-7.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Okeke CO, Quigley HA, Jampel HD, Ying GS, Plyler RJ, Jiang Y, et al. Adherence with topical glaucoma medication monitored electronically the Travatan Dosing Aid study. Ophthalmology 2009;116:191-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Reardon G, Schwartz GF, Mozaffari E. Patient persistency with topical ocular hypotensive therapy in a managed care population. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;137 1 Suppl: S3-12.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Konstas AG, Maskaleris G, Gratsonidis S, Sardelli C. Compliance and viewpoint of glaucoma patients in Greece. Eye (Lond) 2000;14(Pt 5):752-6.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Hodapp E, Parrish RK 2 nd , Anderson DR. Clinical Decisions in Glaucoma 1993. St. Louis: Mosby; 1993. p. 53-61.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Ingersoll KS, Cohen J. The impact of medication regimen factors on adherence to chronic treatment: A review of literature. J Behav Med 2008;31:213-24.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Kosoko O, Quigley HA, Vitale S, Enger C, Kerrigan L, Tielsch JM. Risk factors for noncompliance with glaucoma follow-up visits in a residents′ eye clinic. Ophthalmology 1998;105:2105-11.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Musch DC, Gillespie BW, Niziol LM, Cashwell LF, Lichter PR. Factors associated with intra-ocular pressure before and during 9 years of treatment in the collaborative initial glaucoma treatment study. Ophthalmology 2008;115:927-33.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Kholdebarin R, Campbell RJ, Jin YP, Buys YM. Multicenter study of compliance and drop administration in glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol 2008;43:454-61.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Jampel HD, Schwartz GF, Robin AL, Abrams DA, Johnson E, Miller RB. Patient preferences for eye drop characteristics: A willingness-to-pay analysis. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:540-6.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Castro AN, Mesquita WA. Noncompliance with drug therapy for glaucoma. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2008;71:207-14.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Rees G, Leong O, Crowston JG, Lamoureux EL. Intentional and unintentional nonadherence to ocular hypotensive treatment in patients with glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2010;117:903-8.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Patel SC, Spaeth GL. Compliance in patients prescribed eye drops for glaucoma. Ophthalmic Surg 1995;26:233-6.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
 Oji EO. Glaucoma. Postgrad Doct Afr 1983;5:238-44.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Waziri-Erameh MJ, Omoti AE. Shared responsibility in non-compliance of glaucoma patients in Africa. Trop Ophthalmol 2005;5:138-43.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Friedman DS, Hahn SR, Gelb L, Tan J, Shah SN, Kim EE, et al. Doctor-patient communication, health-related beliefs, and adherence in glaucoma results from the glaucoma adherence and persistency study. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1320-7, 1327.e1-3.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Beckers HJ, Webers CA, Busch MJ, Brink HM, Colen TP, Schouten JS; Dutch Adherence Study Group. Adherence improvement in Dutch glaucoma patients: A randomized controlled trial. Acta Ophthalmol 2013;91:610-8.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Lunnela J, Kääriäinen M, Kyngäs H. The views of compliant glaucoma patients on counselling and social support. Scand J Caring Sci 2010;24:490-8.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Masoud M, Sharabi-Nov A, Pikkel J. Noncompliance with ocular hypertensive treatment in patients with primary open angle glaucoma among the Arab population in Israel: A cross-sectional descriptive study. J Ophthalmol 2013;2013:405130.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Khandekar R, Shama Mel S, Mohammed AJ. Noncompliance with medical treatment among glaucoma patients in Oman - A cross-sectional descriptive study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2005;12:303-9.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Lacey J, Cate H, Broadway DC. Barriers to adherence with glaucoma medications: A qualitative research study. Eye (Lond) 2009;23:924-32.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Tsai JC, McClure CA, Ramos SE, Schlundt DG, Pichert JW. Compliance barriers in glaucoma: A systematic classification. J Glaucoma 2003;12:393-8.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Sleath B, Blalock SJ, Covert D, Skinner AC, Muir KW, Robin AL. Patient race, reported problems in using glaucoma medications, and adherence. ISRN Ophthalmol 2012;2012:902819.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Granström PA, Norell S. Visual ability and drug regimen: Relation to compliance with glaucoma therapy. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1983;61:206-19.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Buchan JC, Siddiqui S, Gilmour D. Once daily drop regimes help reduce involuntary non-compliance. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2007;245:327-8.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Taylor SA, Galbraith SM, Mills RP. Causes of non-compliance with drug regimens in glaucoma patients: A qualitative study. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2002;18:401-9.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Bansal RK, Tsai JC. Compliance/adherence to glaucoma medications - A challenge. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2007;1:22-5.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Lunnela J, Kääriäinen M, Kyngäs H. Adherence of Finnish people with glaucoma to treatment plans and connected factors. Int J Circumpolar Health 2011;70:79-89.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Olawoye O, Tarella S. Spectrum of glaucoma presentation in a Nigerian tertiary hospital. Niger J Ophthalmol 2014;22:11-5.  Back to cited text no. 38
  Medknow Journal  
39.
Onyekwe LO, Okosa MC, Apakama AI. Knowledge and attitude of eye hospital patients towards chronic open angle glaucoma in Onitsha. Niger Med J 2009;50:1-3.  Back to cited text no. 39
  Medknow Journal  
40.
Kass MA, Meltzer DW, Gordon M, Cooper D, Goldberg J. Compliance with topical pilocarpine treatment. Am J Ophthalmol 1986;101:515-23.  Back to cited text no. 40
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]


This article has been cited by
1 Glaucoma care in Nigeria: Is the current practice poised to tackle this emerging sight-threatening disease?
S. N. Onwubiko,N. N. Udeh,O. Nkwegu,D. O. Ukwu,N. Z. Nwachukwu
International Ophthalmology. 2019;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1845    
    Printed45    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded194    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]